Question 2: language
What Question 2 asks
Question 2 points you to a short section of the source and asks how the writer uses language to describe something. It suggests you could write about:
- words and phrases;
- language features and techniques;
- sentence forms.
It tests , is worth 8 marks, and you should spend about 10 minutes on it.
Key terms
Method
- Box the lines you're given, and underline 3–4 interesting words or phrases.
- For each one, write a short paragraph: , (the technique or word class), on the reader.
- Zoom in on single words and their .
- Link your points to the question: how does each choice help describe this place or person?
Two or three detailed paragraphs score more than six thin ones.
Model answer
Look in detail at lines 13 to 22 of the source. How does the writer use language to describe the landscape?
Lawrence describes the landscape as sick and dying. The adjectives ‘dreary and forsaken’ suggest a place that has been abandoned, and even the fowls have ‘abandoned their run’. The simile ‘flames like red sores licking its ashy sides’ makes the burning pit-bank seem diseased, as if the land itself is wounded by the mine. The verb ‘licking’ also personifies the flames as an animal feeding on it. The ‘stagnant light’ suggests that nothing here moves or changes. Together these choices create a semantic field of decay, presenting the mining village as a bleak, unhealthy place to live.
What makes a level 4 answer
The top level (7–8 marks) needs analysis:
- analysing the effects of language, not just naming techniques;
- a (well-chosen) range of short quotations;
- accurate use of subject terminology.
Lower levels describe effects simply, or just spot features. The model answer reaches higher by zooming in on single words like ‘licking’ and linking choices into one idea: a dying landscape.
Common mistake
‘The writer uses a simile to make it more interesting’ says nothing. Explain what the simile makes the reader see or feel.