GCSE Revision

The battles of 1066

1066 in order

Date (1066)Event
5 JanuaryEdward the Confessor dies
6 JanuaryHarold Godwinson is crowned
SummerHarold waits on the south coast with his fleet and the fyrd
8 SeptemberThe fyrd is sent home, its food used up
SeptemberHarald Hardrada and Tostig land in the north
20 SeptemberBattle of Gate Fulford
25 SeptemberBattle of Stamford Bridge
28 SeptemberWilliam lands at Pevensey
14 OctoberBattle of Hastings
25 DecemberWilliam is crowned

Remember

Fulford, Stamford Bridge, Hastings: two battles in the north, then one in the south, all within four weeks.

Gate Fulford and Stamford Bridge

In September, Harald Hardrada and Tostig sailed up the River Ouse towards York. On 20 September they defeated Earls Edwin and Morcar at Gate Fulford, just outside York.

Harold marched north with his housecarls very quickly, and on 25 September took the Norwegians by surprise at Stamford Bridge. Hardrada and Tostig were both killed. So many Norwegians died that the survivors needed only 24 ships to go home.

Significance:

  • Harold had defeated one rival claimant and his brother Tostig.
  • But he had lost many of his best soldiers, and the armies of Edwin and Morcar were badly weakened at Fulford.
  • He was far to the north when William landed at Pevensey on 28 September.

The armies at Hastings

EnglishNormans
LeaderKing HaroldDuke William
SoldiersHousecarls and the fyrd, all on footKnights on horseback (cavalry), foot soldiers, archers and crossbowmen
WeaponsTwo-handed axes, swords, spears and round shieldsLances, swords, bows and kite-shaped shields
PositionOn top of a ridge, in a At the bottom of the slope

The armies were probably of a similar size, perhaps several thousand men each, but historians' estimates vary.

Difference: William's mixed army could attack in different ways. Harold's army relied on one strong defensive tactic, the shield wall.

Key terms

The Battle of Hastings, 14 October 1066

The battle lasted most of the day, which was unusually long.

  1. Norman archers fired, then foot soldiers and cavalry charged uphill. They could not break the shield wall.
  2. Bretons on William's left fled. Some English broke ranks to chase them downhill and were cut down. A rumour spread that William was dead, so he lifted his helmet to show his face and rally his men.
  3. Norman writers say William then used : his cavalry pretended to flee, drew more English off the ridge, then turned and killed them. Some historians doubt these were planned.
  4. The shield wall grew thinner. Late in the day Harold was killed, along with his brothers Gyrth and Leofwine. Exactly how Harold died is unclear. The English then fled.
Source: the Bayeux Tapestry
A scene from the Bayeux Tapestry, a long embroidery made in the 1070s, probably for Bishop Odo, which tells the story of 1064–66 from the Norman point of view.
A scene from the Bayeux Tapestry at the end of the Battle of Hastings, with the words 'Harold rex interfectus est' above it. On the left, a soldier under the name Harold holds what may be an arrow near his face. In the centre, a Norman horseman cuts down an English soldier, who falls with his axe. In the border below, the dead are being stripped of their armour.
HAROLD REX INTERFECTVS EST
Public domain: the photographer released this photograph of the tapestry into the public domain. Where this image is from

('Harold rex interfectus est' means 'King Harold is killed'.) The words run above two figures: one with what may be an arrow near his face, and one being cut down by a horseman. The Tapestry doesn't make clear which is Harold, or whether both are. This is one reason historians disagree about how he died.

Key terms

What the English chronicle says

Source: the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle
From the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle's entry for 1066, written by English monks after the Norman Conquest.
William, however, came against him unawares, ere his army was collected; but the king, nevertheless, very hardly encountered him with the men that would support him: and there was a great slaughter made on either side. There was slain King Harold, and Leofwin his brother, and Earl Girth his brother, with many good men: and the Frenchmen gained the field of battle, as God granted them for the sins of the nation.
Translated by James Ingram, 1823

('Ere' means 'before'.) The monk blames Harold's lack of soldiers, and sees the defeat as God's punishment of the English. Both ideas are useful evidence of how English people explained the Conquest.

Why William won

Historians usually group the reasons like this:

William's strengthsHarold's mistakesLuck
Careful planning, a large fleet and a mixed armyFought before his whole army had gatheredWinds delayed William, so Harold had to fight Hardrada first
Cavalry, archers and feigned retreatsHis men broke ranks to chase the NormansWilliam landed unopposed: the fyrd had gone home
Strong leadership and the Pope's supportHis army was tired after Stamford BridgeHarold and his brothers were all killed

Cause: historians weigh these differently. Many argue Harold's death decided the battle, because it ended English resistance on the field.

Exam tip

In a 'How far do you agree?' question about the main reason for William's victory, explain the stated reason, then at least one other, and finish with a judgement saying which mattered most and why.

Key terms

Take the quiz