9 marks · about 9 minutes
To what extent does a large-scale water transfer scheme you have studied bring more advantages than disadvantages?
To what extent means: Weigh up how far something is true, with evidence on both sides, then give a clear judgement.
Link it
Use the facts from:
- The Lesotho Highlands Water Project (Lesotho and Gauteng, South Africa, From the 1990s)
Level 1 (Basic)· 3/9 marks (band 1–3)
The Lesotho Highlands Water Project gives water to South Africa. But people had to move. It has more advantages.
Why this level: A named scheme with simple points and an unsupported judgement. To reach Level 2: use facts to explain the advantages and disadvantages.
Level 2 (Clear)· 5/9 marks (band 4–6)
The Lesotho Highlands Water Project uses dams such as Katse and Mohale to store water, which tunnels carry to Gauteng in South Africa. About 780 million cubic metres are transferred each year. Lesotho earns royalties and gets electricity from a hydroelectric station. However, villages and farmland were flooded, and many people had to move.
Why this level: Clear, accurate advantages and disadvantages. But they aren't weighed, and there's no judgement. To reach Level 3: compare who gains and who loses, then conclude.
Level 3 (Detailed)· 8/9 marks (band 7–9)
The Lesotho Highlands Water Project stores water behind dams in Lesotho's rainy mountains, such as Katse and Mohale, and tunnels carry it to the Vaal River system serving Gauteng, South Africa's economic heartland. About 780 million cubic metres are transferred each year, and Phase II aims to raise this to 1,260 million, giving South Africa's cities and industries a reliable supply. Lesotho also gains: South Africa pays royalties for the water, an important income for a poor country, and the scheme's hydroelectric station supplies Lesotho with electricity. However, there are disadvantages. Villages, farmland and grazing land were flooded by the reservoirs, and many people had to move, losing their homes and livelihoods. River flow below the dams changed, and some contractors were convicted of bribery. Overall, the scheme brings more advantages than disadvantages, but they are unevenly shared: South Africa gains most, while the costs fall mainly on rural people in Lesotho.
Why this level: Detailed, accurate evidence on both sides, with a judgement that considers who gains and who loses. This is Level 3.