9 marks · about 9 minutes
Evaluate how successful the responses to a named tropical storm were.
Evaluate means: Judge strengths and weaknesses or successes and failures, then reach a conclusion.
Level 1 (Basic)· 3/9 marks (band 1–3)
After Typhoon Haiyan, other countries sent aid. People were evacuated. The responses were quite successful but lots of people still died.
Why this level: A named storm and two simple responses, but no detail and the judgement isn't supported. To reach Level 2: describe immediate and long-term responses with facts, and say what worked and what didn't.
Level 2 (Clear)· 5/9 marks (band 4–6)
Typhoon Haiyan hit the Philippines in November 2013. Before it struck, many people were evacuated, which saved lives. After the storm, international aid sent rescue teams, field hospitals and supplies. In the long term, the Reconstruction Assistance on Yolanda plan set out about US$8 billion of rebuilding over four years. However, about 6,300 people still died.
Why this level: Clear, accurate immediate and long-term responses with figures. But the evaluation is thin: it doesn't explain why responses failed or reach a reasoned judgement. To reach Level 3: weigh successes against failures and conclude.
Level 3 (Detailed)· 8/9 marks (band 7–9)
The responses to Typhoon Haiyan, which struck the Philippines on 8 November 2013, were partly successful. Warnings meant many people were evacuated before the storm, which saved lives, and international aid quickly sent rescue teams, field hospitals, food and water. In the long term, the Reconstruction Assistance on Yolanda plan set out about US$8 billion of rebuilding over four years, mostly housing, aiming to build back better. However, the responses had serious failures. The storm surge, several metres high, was underestimated, and some evacuation shelters were themselves flooded, so about 6,300 people died, many drowned. Around 4.1 million people were displaced, and rebuilding was slow, with many families waiting years for new homes. Overall, the immediate responses were more successful than the long-term ones: warnings and aid saved many lives, but the surge was not fully understood, and recovery was too slow for many of the 11 million people affected.
Why this level: Detailed, accurate facts on both immediate and long-term responses, with successes and failures weighed and a judgement that compares them. This is Level 3.